<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE rss [<!ENTITY % HTMLlat1 PUBLIC "-//W3C//ENTITIES Latin 1 for XHTML//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml-lat1.ent">]>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://benfrank.net/patriots">
<channel>
 <title>America Needs 435 Real Americans to run for Congress - 911</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/taxonomy/term/33/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Fear Not The Truth</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/911/fear_not_the_truth</link>
 <description>&lt;span class=&quot;c&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;big&gt;&quot;Ye Shall know the Truth,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

and the Truth shall set you free&quot;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;

&lt;span class=&quot;r&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;-- JC&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/911">911</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:42:28 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Using their own words against them to prove that they are Lying</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/forum/using_their_own_words_against_them</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;One way to encourage people to investigate 9/11 is to prove to them that government officials are lying. One cannot prove the controlled demolitions in a matter of seconds, but the lying is much easier- especially if we use their own words and contradictory statements to prove that they are lying.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exhibit 1: Condoleeza Rice to the 9/11 Commission about the August 6th Memo Bush received while on vacation in Texas: &quot;I believe the title was &lt;a href=&quot;http://benfrank.net/patriots/files/audio/condi-the_title_was.mp3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong &gt;Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; &lt;img src=&quot;http://benfrank.net/nuke/images/mp3a.gif&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exhibit 2: Condoleeza Rice describing her reaction: &lt;a href=&quot;http://benfrank.net/patriots/files/audio/condi-terrible_accident.mp3&quot;&gt;&quot;... my first thought was, what a terrible accident.&quot; &lt;img src=&quot;http://benfrank.net/nuke/images/mp3a.gif&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Exhibit 3: Bush: &lt;a href=&quot;http://benfrank.net/patriots/files/audio/bush-terrible_accident.mp3&quot;&gt;&quot;my first thought was, there&#039;s one terrible pilot...&quot; &lt;img src=&quot;http://benfrank.net/nuke/images/mp3a.gif&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The obvious question is: Why did the President and National Security Advisor both think it was a terrible accident when they had recently received a memo titled &quot;Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside the United States&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Either they are incompetent or lying- period. There is no other explanation.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/911">911</category>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/audio">Audio</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 15 Aug 2006 21:42:27 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>If the Congress had any committment to the Constitution, Bush would have been impeached a long time ago (audio)</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/congresscorrupt</link>
 <description>&lt;big&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://st911.org&quot;&gt;James Fetzer, PhD&lt;/a&gt;: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archive.org/download/st911/st911-m2-congress_corrupt.mp3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Congress is Corrupt&lt;/strong&gt; (1.5 min mp3&lt;br&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;blue&quot;&gt;play at work&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/big&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

&quot;This man, this administration has committed so many impeachable offenses that if the Congress had any guts, any integrity, any intestinal fortitude, any committment to the Constitution he would have been subject to impeachment a long time ago.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;

What that means is the &lt;strong&gt;Congress has to be re-constituted&lt;/strong&gt;, the Congress has been co-opted, the Congress is completely corrupt. You have to vote, whether Democrat or Republican, &lt;span class=&quot;red&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;vote every one of them out of office&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt; unless they can justify being returned, and you better have very stringent standards for that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/911">911</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 26 Mar 2006 16:42:31 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Mindy Kleinberg&#039;s Testimony to the 9/11 Commission</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/911/mindys_testimony</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;br &gt;&lt;big &gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.archive.org/download/mindy_k/911_widow_mindy_kleinberg-k142g.mp3&quot;&gt;&lt;strong &gt;Listen to Mrs. Kleinberg read this statement&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; mp3&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the week prior to September 11th both the SEC and U.S. intelligence agencies ignored one major stock-market indicator, one that could have yielded valuable information with regard to the September 11th attacks. On the Chicago Board Options Exchange during the week before September 11th, put options were purchased on American and United Airlines, the two airlines involved in the attacks. The investors who placed these orders were gambling that in the short term, the stock prices of both airlines would plummet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Never before on the Chicago Exchange were such large amounts of United and American Airlines options traded. These investors netted a profit of several million dollars after the September 11th attacks. Interestingly, the names of the investors remain undisclosed and the millions remain unclaimed in the Chicago Exchange account.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why were these aberrant trades not discovered prior to 9/11? Who were the individuals who placed these trades? Have they been investigated? Who was responsible for monitoring these activities? Have those individuals been held responsible for their inaction?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/911">911</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:19:47 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>FAA Managers Destroyed 9/11 Tape</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/911/faa_managers_destroyed_9_11_tape</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;According to the report, a second manager at the New York center
promised a union official representing the controllers that he would
&quot;get rid of&quot; the tape after controllers used it to provide written
statements to federal officials about the events of the day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, the second manager said he destroyed the tape between
December 2001 and January 2002 by &lt;strong&gt;crushing the tape with his hand,
cutting it into small pieces and depositing the pieces into trash cans
around the building&lt;/strong&gt;, the report said. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&quot;The destruction of evidence in the Government&#039;s possession, in this
case an audiotape -- particularly during times of national crisis --
has the effect of fostering an appearance that information is being
withheld from the public.&quot; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/911">911</category>
 <pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:57:50 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Respected Physicists, Engineers, Air Force Fighter Pilots all Question the Official 9/11 Story</title>
 <link>http://benfrank.net/patriots/911/respected_scientists_engineers_question</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A group of distinguished experts and scholars, including &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bowmanforcongress.com&quot;&gt;Robert M. Bowman&lt;/a&gt;, James H. Fetzer, Wayne Madsen, John McMurtry, Morgan Reynolds, and Andreas von Buelow, have concluded that senior government officials have covered up crucial facts about what really happened on 9/11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They have joined with others in common cause as members of &quot;Scholars for 9/11 Truth&quot; (S9/11T), because they are convinced, based on their own research, that the administration has been deceiving the nation about critical events in New York and Washington, D.C.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These experts suggest these events may have been orchestrated by elements within the administration to manipulate Americans into supporting policies at home and abroad they would never have condoned absent &quot;another Pearl Harbor.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They believe that this White House is incapable of investigating itself and hope the possibility that Congress might hold an unaccountable administration accountable is not merely naive or wishful thinking.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;They are encouraging news services around the world to secure scientific advice by taking advantage of university resources to verify or to falsify their discoveries. Extraordinary situations, they believe, require extraordinary measures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If this were done, they contend, one of the great hoaxes of history would stand naked before the eyes of the world and its perpetrators would be clearly exposed, which may be the only hope for saving this nation from ever greater abuse.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <category domain="http://benfrank.net/patriots/911">911</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 00:02:26 -0500</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
