Iraq: Civil War or Divide and Conquer
Everyday the US Corporate Media bombards America with the “huge spike in violence” that inevitably means that Iraq is descending into civil war. We’re told there are two choices, it’s a civil war, or its “al Qaeda” - but there is a third option the corporate media refuses to utter.
Even high-school slackers have heard of the age-old strategy “Divide and Conquer”. Is it possible that there are outside forces working this strategy in Iraq today? Perhaps rogue elements inside some government(s) would like to conquer Iraq for the oil, permanent bases, strategic position, etc.
Why is it that nobody in the TV news world can utter this possibility? Is it really that outrageous to think that perhaps the same people that lied to launch the war, are still lying today to prolong the war?
Let’s look at a few “under-reported” stories:
- US car theft rings probed for ties to Iraq bombings
Think about that: Car-bombs in Iraq are made with cars Stolen in the USA Does “al-Qaeda” have C-130s or huge ships capable of transporting the stolen cars to Iraq? If “al Qaeda” had operatives in America, would they really be stealing cars to ship them to Iraq? Seems quite illogical to me. - Undercover British soldiers caught red-handed: Dressed as Arabs in a car full of explosives with a remote detonator
- Foreign Fighter Lie Exposed: 1300 insurgents arrested- all Iraqis, no foreigners
- Iraqis had a “No to the Occupation” Protest, which was much larger than the Saddam Statue Toppled “Celebration”
- Many Iraqis believe ’suicide’ bombings done by US to start a civil war
“I believe it is the Americans who are doing this, pretending it is the Sunni, so there will be a civil war and they can control our wealth.” - El Salvador-style ‘death squads’ to be deployed by US against Iraq militants
- “Death Squads” Negroponte appointed ambassador to Iraq: Six Months later, Death Squads appear
The question: Is it possible that “Divide and Conquer” is a strategy being employed by our own government, not just Bush and the Republicons, but also by the majority of DC Democrats. Is it possible that this is a war of conquest, and Americans are the modern day equivalent of the “good germans” duped by the gov’t propaganda.
Is it possible that millions of Americans are “willfully ignorant”, accepting the lies because it’s so much easier than confronting the fact that they’ve been supporting murderers and liars.
ps- dont’ forget about the numerous polls indicating that
MOST Iraqis want US Troops to leave.
Still believe it’s a Civil War? One last factoid to consider:
Out of Iraq’s 6.5 million married couples, 2 million are Sunni-Shia unions
* * *
December 1st, 2006 at 8:46 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J18H03w_wg
Please do watch this video. Any photo shop experts ? Try superimposing face.
The reason the zionist media keeps Americans in the dark because they know that 911 was not done by Arabs but Jews.
December 1st, 2006 at 11:07 am
Remember the British SAS who were caught in Iraq planting IEDs and had a car full of explosives? The zionist/neo-con goal has always been chaos in the ENTIRE Middle East. Iraq is a diversion. As the army attacks Iraq, the US gov’t erodes rights at home by suspending habeas corpus, stealing private lands, banning books like “America Deceived” from Amazon, rigging elections, conducting warrantless wiretaps and starting 2 illegal wars based on lies. Soon, another US false-flag operation will occur (sinking of an Aircraft Carrier by Mossad) and the US will invade Iran (on behalf of Israel).
Final link (before Google Books bends to gov’t demands and censors the title):
http://www.iuniverse.com/bookstore/book_detail.asp?&isbn=0-595-38523-0
December 1st, 2006 at 7:40 pm
I remember seeing it as a basic principle of the Bonesmen-
“Create conflict to bring about change”.
December 1st, 2006 at 10:04 pm
I think more and more people are slowly waking up to this very ugly reality. I ruminated on this also a few days ago.
The lying MSM strove from the start to prop up this fraud of being in Iraq for positive reasons. The fascist Baker group was brought in to make it look like they’re studying the problem but it’s just stalling for time while they finish building the obscene bases and embassy. Meanwhile the zio/fascists keep blowing up shrines and marketplaces and blaming “sectarian violence”.
December 2nd, 2006 at 4:26 am
Right on the money I think. Could it be that this is all ‘democracy’ could ever amount to though? [warning: rant on democracy follows]
Money can (and is) accumulated. It will always overpower the ‘vote’ as a means of allocating power within a given social order (society OR ‘civil -iz- ation’). Once money comes to power, democracy is secretly overthrown by plutocracy, and as the plutocrats create ‘trusts’, aristocracy is is formed and shuts out all competition.
“Fascism isn’t some little guy with a mustache that hates jews - it is the final stage in the monopolization of all wealth” - John Judge.
George W. Bush is not the fool that most would like to believe - they’d like to believe it because the masses are highly indocrinated with false morality and terrified of the possibility that Bush (and those he works for) lack their morality. GWB is merely the ‘bad-cop’ in a great game of ‘good-cop:bad-cop’. The ideals of democracy are founded on lies and it persists today because the powers that be - the aristocrats - find it a useful tool for inhibiting uprisings amoungst their slaves. [if you barrow their money or pay taxes to a governmental or church body that they control, then you are enslaved by them - a fraction of your labor is being drawn off and handed over to them]. Democracy fools the average person into thinking that they have a say, when in reality they do not. In fact the aristocrats bet every horse in the race - the race is fixed - they own the horses. Further if the horse betrayed them it would be put down - only Andrew Jackson escaped that fate, and that was a long time ago when the powers that be held far far less power.
Divide and conquer is what is happening in Iraq and in the US, and anywhere that has a resource that the powers that be wish to control. This has always been the case and will continue to be the case until a new form of social order comes about that is more powerful than aristocracy - a new social order that the aristocrats themselves will want to be a part of. Roddenberry dreamed of such a world, can it ever happen. . .? The rich themselves do often lament at the problems caused by money - yet to sacrifice that power would be akin to switching off your life support system - its a addiction for them, as basic to survival as food. If they would ever give it up then they would have to have a good alternative.
I recomend the following links on my website:
https://www.earthsociety.org/index.php?pgxfer=430
And for those wishing to take part in the research:
https://members.earthsociety.org
Dividing to conquer is an ancient and still highly effective means of victory over an enemy. Yet it ultimately replaces one aristocracy with another and taken as a whole for our species, it changes nothing. Real change comes through invention - not many people are still using windows 3.0 - Real change will come when we stop trying to divide and instead work together to create a real solution.
So if you want to kick GWB out of office, ask yourself - is it really going to change anything? The obvious answer is no it will not. Will killing the aristocrats change anything? No it will not - eventually a new aristocracy will arise, seeking control over resources is in the genes of all living things - it is a NECESSARY tool of life that brings enhances adaptivity. Yet some systems/genes/memes are evolutionary dead ends. Money is one such system. Let us get on with determining a replacement for it that doesn’t involve violence, but instead, intelligence. Let us create a new system that is so superior that the aristocrats will join so as not to be left behind. The time has come for real change.
Thanks for reading,
Tyler Jordan
December 3rd, 2006 at 4:53 am
Deception is the name of the game:
Israel Fakes a Provocation for War(the “kidnapping” of Cpl Shalit).
The following passages are from this article published in the Telegraph on 26/06/2006.
Last night two Israeli soldiers were killed and another kidnapped in a dawn attack by Palestinian militants who tunnelled under Gaza’s heavily protected border.
The attackers, believed to number seven or eight, surprised Israeli forces when they appeared at first light through a tunnel on open ground 300 yards inside Israel near a kibbutz.
Gaza is built on old semi-consolidated sand dunes. It is extremely unlikely that anyone could tunnel 500, or more, yards in the sandy ground of Gaza (300 yards into Israel plus 200 yards of no-mans land plus more to the tunnel entrance), without the tunnel collapsing at some point, or the Israeli listening equipment, hearing their tunneling activity.
They split into three groups before launching simultaneous attacks on three Israeli defensive positions - a look-out tower, plus a tank and an (unoccupied) armoured personnel carrier, both dug in, facing Gaza.
If you were only seven or eight, would you split into three groups? If you were only two, or three, would you attack a tank over flat ground, manned by four soldiers waiting inside to kill you?
They blew open the tank’s rear doors (the Israeli merkava tank has one rear door) with a missile fired from point-blank range before tossing grenades inside. Two of the tank crew died and another was severely wounded but the final crew member, the gunner, was forced out of the wreckage at gunpoint.
The rear doors are blown off and a few grenades popped inside. Tanks are not made to fall apart. Blowing off the rear doors would have taken a blast sufficient to seriously hurt those inside. The grenades would have then made mincemeat of them.
Later reports, from the New York Times and others, tell us that Shalit suffered only minor injuries to his abdomen and one arm, even though everyone else in the tank was severely wounded or killed. Shalit would have been very close to those killed (there’s not much spare room in a tank).
And, how exactly did the Jew press find out about his injuries, when no one else seems to have known.
Israeli trackers said they found his blood-stained bulletproof vest close to the Gaza perimeter fence.
One wonders, if it is standard practice to wear a bulletproof vest inside a hot tank, especially Shalit, who was supposedly the gunner. One would think that the tank would be bulletproof enough not to require such a vest. Can Israeli tanks stop bullets, or not?
Anyway, the militants force Shalit to take off his bulletproof vest and leave it close to the Gaza concentration camp fence, in order to help the Israeli’s with their investigation. By the way, whose blood is it on his bulletproof vest? Did his minor wounds bleed profusely, or was it the other soldiers blood and guts all over him. Pity their bulletproof vests didn’t save them.
Meanwhile, two other militants attacked a nearby concrete watchtower…. The troop carrier was also damaged in another attack but it was unoccupied. The attackers then escaped back into Gaza by cutting their way through the perimeter fence.
Interestingly, the attackers escaped easily by cutting through the (electrified) perimeter fence and running across the minefield to safety. Yet, cutting through the perimeter fence in order to get in, was so hard to do, that they burrowed through half a mile of sandy ground instead. Something wrong with this story, perhaps?
Even, after all the commotion, the soldiers in all of the nearby Gaza concentration camp guard-towers, manage to miss a few Arabs running the 300 yards, over flat ground, to the perimeter fence, miss them as they cut through it, and miss them as they run across the minefield to safety.
And why, you may ask, did they not just return through the tunnel they had painstakingly dug?
Not only did the Israeli guard-tower watchers sleep during the explosions and pandamonium, but our heroic freedom fighters did not put a foot wrong as they ran through the no-mans land minefield. Allah, was truly with them.
If you believe this sad tale, then I have a bridge to sell you.
The Hamas political leadership sought to distance itself from the incident last night when a spokesman said it had no knowledge of the fate of Cpl Shilat. Ghazi Hamad, a spokesman, said: “We are calling on the resistance groups, if they do have the missing soldier to protect his life and treat him well.”
Yes, the Hamas political leadership had no idea of the fate of Cpl Shilat, as the story is a total fabrication.
The Jew press then claims that the Popular Resistance Committees, the armed wing of Hamas and the (previously unknown) Army of Islam were jointly responsible for the kidnapping of Shilat.
Why three groups you may ask?
The reason for three groups, is so that each of them might believe that the other has the “kidnapped” soldier, when, in fact, none of them have him. He is sipping coffee in Tel Aviv.
And why did a “previously unknown” group put up its hand?
Well, just in case one of the groups had doubts that the other group had the “kidnapped” soldier, they certainly couldn’t be sure the “previously unknown” group didn’t have him,… because after all, they don’t have any idea who is leading, or even anyone in, this unknown group.
So the reason for the weird “I did it arrangement,” is so that the Jew press can claim that the Arabs claimed responsibility, when all they have done, is to NOT deny they did it.
Oh yeah, the “previously unknown” group is a Jew invention. It doesn’t exist, except in the Jew newspapers.
Of course, shortly, the Army of Islam will need to be created (by the Jews) in order to negotiate the “release” of Shilat.
As part of the fabrication, the Jews chose to have a Israeli/French citizen “kidnapped,” as the French have not been slavishly following the Jew script, and this could be used to force their hand in the desired way.
If you are not already convinced that the whole story is a fabrication, ask yourself; What were the four Israeli soldiers doing in the tiny confines of that dug-in tank? Ask yourself; How long were they going to continue sitting in that tank? All day perhaps, or till they roasted in the desert sun? Or, till another group of four took over on the next shift? And of course, having four soldiers in just one tank, won’t provide a defense, so there will have to be hundreds of tanks and hundreds of soldiers all sitting in these tanks,…
all waiting,… all waiting,… all waiting,…. for exactly what?
Waiting for Palestinian children to throw stones at them, perhaps? Perhaps, waiting attentively for militants to dig a half mile tunnel through sandy ground, pop up, and rush them over flat ground, but not attentively enough to see them approach? Perhaps, they were waiting for the Egyptian army to materialize, Star Trek like, from their bases hundreds of miles away on the other side of the Suez canal? I don’t know,… you tell me why?
Yes, the story is a total fabrication. A fake provocation to start a war. Yes, the Jews are evil people.
December 3rd, 2006 at 5:07 pm
The article said “..suicide bombings done by US to start a civil war..” How could this possibly be done? It is not US GIs who are blowing themselves up!
Could the US possibly have mind control weapons capable of making Iraqis do this? Why does no one ever speak of such weapons? Is this silence more evidence of the far reach of the NWO Conspiracy?
Show you ( and those who never report on such things) are not part of the NWO C, and talk about these mind assault weapons you fully well know about